Motorcycle Accident Case Law

Filtering
Junctions
Leading and Following
Overtaking
Pedestrians
Roundabouts
Rural riding
Speed
Misleading signals
Product liability
Contributory negligence

Filtering

Harding v Hinchclife (1964)
Car pulls out from junction and hits motorcyle filtering past a bus. Driver 100% to blame.

Powell v Moody (1966)
Motorcyclist filtering on offside of two rows of stationary cars collides with car driver. Driver 20% to blame.

Clarke v Windchurch (1969)
Car and filtering moped collide.

Worsfold v Howe (1980)
Motorcyclist filters past stationary tanker at a junction and collides with vehicle crossing in front. Driver 50% to blame.

Fagan v Jeffers (2005)
Motorcyclist undertakes stationary vehicles and collides with a car. Driver 50% to blame.

Davis v Schrogin (2006)
Motorcyclist overtaking a staionary queue of traffic when a car does a U-turn. Driver 100% to blame.

Woodham v Turner (2012)
Motorcyclist filtering past a stationary tractor and trailer at a junction collide with bus which is turning out. Driver 50% to blame.

Burton v Evitt (2011)
Motorcyclist overtakes a row of stationary traffic and collides with lead vehicle which is turning right. Driver 20% to blame (on appeal).

Jones v Lawton (2013)
Motorcyclist filtering using opposing carriageway collides with vehicle pulling across his path at a junction. Driver 2/3rd to blame.


Junctions

Harding v Hinchcliffe (1964)
Car pulls out from junction and hits motorcyle filtering past a bus. Driver 100% to blame.

Powell v Hansen and Chin (2001)
Car at crossroads collides with speeding motorcycle. Driver 80% to blame.

Mackeldon v Hinton (2005)
Motorcyclist following lorry which suddenly turns left causing motorcyclist to come off and into path of another car. Driver 30% to blame.

Farley v Buckley (2007)
Scooter collides with refuge lorry which is turning left at a junction. Scooter rider 100% to blame.

Heaton v Herzog (2008)
Car collides with speeding motorcyclist at junction. Driver 25% to blame.

Hamilton v O’Kane and Another (2009)
Pillion on motorcycle injured in collision with a car exited a junction. Driver 50% to blame

Duncan v Walshe
Lorry and motrocycle travelling in opposite directions collide as lorry turns into minor road. Lorry driver 100% to blame.

Hernandez v Acar 
A speeding motorcyclist and car collide at a junction. Blame is apportioned 60/40 in favour of the motorcyclist due to causitive potency.

Kyriacou v Finch (2021) 1 WLUK 359
Speeding scooter rider overtakes van at junction and collides with car which cuts corner and pulls out in front of him.

Vincent Ringe v Eden Springs (UK) Ltd (2012)

Woodham v Turner 2012


Brooks v Burgess (1996)


Dowling v Dargue (1996)


Garston Warehousing Co v O F Smart (Liverpool)
(1973)

Laws v Williams & Anor [2018] EWHC 1871 (QB) (18th July, 2018)

Stark v Lyddon 2019


Shevlin v European Metal Recycling Ltd [2018] EWHC 1695 (QB) 


Leading & Following

Sharp v Avery (1938)

Smith v Harris (1939)

Thompson v Spedding (1973)


Clift v Hawes (1999)


Dorning v Personal Representatives of Paul Rigby (2007)


Lindsay v Lamb (2007)


Bellingham and Others v Todd (2011)

Leslie O’Donnell v Lisa Smith and Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Plc [2018] SC EDIN 68


Overtaking

Hillman v Tompkins (1995)

Pell v Moseley (2003)

Shaw v Russell and Another (2004)


Morrison v Gardener (2005)


Davis v Schrogin (2006)


Ogden and Chadwick v Barber and Higgs (2008)


Beasley v Alexander (2012)


Pedestrians

Ratter v Halcrow (2005)

Scott v Gavigan [2016] EWCA Civ 544
Drunk pedestrian runs out in front of motorcyclist, causing a collision.


Roundabouts

Grace v Tanner (2003)


Rural Riding

Askey v Wood (2005)

John Mosier v Thomas Simpson (2001)

Arnot v Sprake (2001)

Whiteford v Kubas UAB (Court of Appeal Civil Division) 9th May 2012

Hardy v Walder (1984)

Russell v NFU Mutual (2014)

McIntosh v Aviva Insurance UK Ltd [2018] SC EDIN 2

Buswell v Symes [2015] EWHC 1379 (QB)

Mitrasinovic v Stroud (2020) EWHC 914 (QB)

Amy Cockburn v MCE Insurance Company Limited 2019 SC EDIN 75
Motorcyclist and car collide at a corner on a country road. Both blame each for encroaching but there are no witnesses.


Speed

Bingham v Fuller (1997)

Waller v Levoi (1968)

Askey v Wood (2005)

Dale McFarlane v Barry Thain and James Campbell (2007)

Ringe v Eden Springs (UK) Ltd QBD 12/1/12

Hardy v Walder (1984)

Goad v Butcher [2011]
Collision between speeding motorcyclist and tractor that had cut a corner whilst turning.

McPherson v Smith & Ors [2018] EWHC 1433 (QB)

Everett v Dyer (2019)
A motorcyclist riding at 100mph just prior to the incident results in 25% contributory negligence due to causative potency.

Hernandez v Acar (2019)
A speeding motorcyclist and car collide at a junction. Blame is apportioned 60/40 in favour of the motorcyclist due to causitive potency

Amy Cockburn v MCE Insurance Company Limited 2019 SC EDIN 75
Motorcyclist and car collide at a corner on a country road. Both blame each for encroaching but there are no witnesses.

Stark v Lyddon

Buchan v Whiting [2008] EWHC 2951 (QB) 

Kyriacou v Finch (2021) 1 WLUK 359
Speeding scooter rider overtakes van at junction and collides with car which cuts corner and pulls out in front of him.


Misleading Signals

Wadsworth v Gillespie (1978)

Davis v Swinwood (2003)

Higgins v Johnson (2008)


Product Liability

Baker v KTM Sportmotorcycle UK Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 378
Motorcyclist sues KTM for brake seizure.


Contributory Negligence

Capps v Miller (1989)
Failure by a motorcyclist to fasten the chin strap of his crash helmet can amount to contributory negligence.

Amy Cockburn v MCE Insurance Company Limited 2019 SC EDIN 75
Motorcyclist and car collide at a corner on a country road. Both blame each for encroaching but there are no witnesses.

Everett v Dyer
A motorcyclist riding at 100mph just prior to the incident results in 25% contributory negligence due to causative potency.

Stark v Lyddon
A speeding motorcyclist travelling at more than twice the speed limit had his damages reduced by 70% as it was seen to the prime causitive factor for the collision.

Hernandez v Acar 
A speeding motorcyclist and car collide at a junction. Blame is apportioned 60/40 in favour of the motorcyclist due to causitive potency

Kyriacou v Finch (2021) 1 WLUK 359
Speeding scooter rider overtakes van at junction and collides with car which cuts corner and pulls out in front of him.


 

Quick Enquiry

Enter your details above to enquire or just give your name and number to request a call back from one of our specialist cycle accident lawyers.